Fatcow Icon
BCVFD continues to proclaim ‘private’ status
by ANTHONY CLOUD / Staff Writer
Jan 12, 2012 | 3161 views | 4 4 comments | 8 8 recommendations | email to a friend | print
Considered citizen Kathy Warren owned a building that burned down in Arjay on January 1, after the station was closed.
Considered citizen Kathy Warren owned a building that burned down in Arjay on January 1, after the station was closed.
slideshow
Executive Court Judge Albey Brock explained that the fiscal court would pay all necessary legal expenses to keep all stations opened, while he was at the BCVFD meeting.
Executive Court Judge Albey Brock explained that the fiscal court would pay all necessary legal expenses to keep all stations opened, while he was at the BCVFD meeting.
slideshow
PINEVILLE — After appearing at the Bell County Volunteer Fire Department’s (BCVFD) regular meeting on Wednesday with concern about recent events, the public was denied any opportunity to question the board of directors or express their concerns.

When asked how they could end a meeting without addressing the public, newly elected president Mike Cupp stated that it was because they are a private corporation.

Executive Court Judge Albey Brock stated that they are classified a 5013C, a non-profit organization.

“That does not make you private,” said Brock. “That makes you a 5013C.”

Brock also stated that the department is entrusted by the people to run the fire department.

“The tragedy in it is that now you guys are thinking that it’s yours and that they (the citizens) got nothing to do with it,” Brock said.

Kathy Warren, who owned a building in Arjay, had a building that was severely damaged in a fire on January 1.

“If we had a fire department in Arjay, I wouldn’t have had such a big loss,” said Warren. “Now since you are a private corporation, do I need to sue you for that (damage done to her building)?”

Warren stated that she was thankful for what was saved, but she also said that she had a big loss.

There were heated exchanges between the audience and the board members. At one point, board member Richard Fain shouted “shut up” to the audience so Mikey Wilder could read a letter from federal court.

The audience called for funding cuts to the BCVFD. Others stated that a new fire department should be set up.

Brock did receive permission from the fiscal court to purchase emergency fire trucks and equipment from the fire protection fund in case they are needed.

The subscription fee was also discussed after the meeting. The subscription fee is a voluntary fee.

For the subscription fee to be mandatory, it would have to pass through fiscal court. In the recent fiscal court meeting, the magistrates stated that they would not vote for a mandatory subscription fee.

The board declared, as they have in the past, that the reason for the closing of the two fire stations (Arjay and Colmer) is a lack of funding. The board agreed to sell four acres of land at Arjay.

In the fiscal court meeting, Brock stated that the fiscal court pledges to the BCVFD to pay all necessary legal expenses to keep all stations opened, but maintained that they will not allocate money to the BCVFD as long as stations remain closed.

It was also emphasized that the fiscal court has allocated over $5 million in tax dollars to the BCVFD since 1978.

Another issue that the board stated was a lack of volunteers.

Charles Collett handed in his resignation as a board member during the meeting, and cited backbiting from fellow members as his reason for resigning. Collett pledged to stay on with the fire department as a member.

Many of those in attendance were also angry because they could not hear what was being said during the meeting.

“I come to this meeting to try and get first hand knowledge of what I need to know in this community. I’ve been in this meeting and I still don’t know anymore than what I did when I first come up here because I have hard of hearing,” said one man.

As things began to escalate, Brock addressed the public and stated that arguing with the BCVFD Board of Directors would not change the direction of the embattled organization.

“We can stay in here all night long fussing with these guys, and I promise you nothing will change. The fiscal court is doing all that it can from a legal stand point to try and settle this,” said Brock. “It’s obvious that there is a disagreement. They believe they are private. The fiscal court and the majority of you folks don’t think they are.”

The meeting ended with an understanding by all parties that the disagreement will only be settled in a court of law.

Anthony Cloud is a staff writer for the Middlesboro Daily News. Contact him via e-mail at acloud@heartlandpublications.com.
Comments
(4)
Comments-icon Post a Comment
Sawbriar
|
January 13, 2012
You might also mention that the fire department explained their relationship with fiscal court was more of a contractor one. Something the JE hotly denied. But in a story in this very newspaper just a few years ago, it was acknowledged the relationship was BY CONTRACT.

Sounds like a contractor to me.
Willsmith19
|
January 13, 2012
This article is poorly researched at best and unfairly biased against the bcvfd at worst. First, the document that was trying to be read by Mikey Wilder was not a letter, but was an Agreed Permanant Injunction entered in federal court in 2007 between the bcvfd and fiscal court. And members of the press have access to it too because it's a public record and it has been written about in 2007 by this very paper. That document explains and supports the bcvfd's position on why they are private (as does the confidential settlement agreement referenced in the injunction) but the people were so rude at the meeting that they wouldn't even let the bcvfd explain. So when i read that the bcvfd denied an opportunity for citizens to question the board, that is false. This group attending the bcvfd's BOARD MEETING was not a representative sample of people from the community, this was a group of Brock's followers with an ill-willed agenda. Perhaps reporting how the bcvfd asked each person attending the meeting to sign up to be a volunteer would have been good to know. And perhaps reporting how many of these people tore up the volunteer sheet in the face of the bcvfd member who handed it to them would show the type of people who attended. Instead you print uninformed comments from these same people without mentioning their over the top actions. For example, if either this reporter or any other human being can explain how calls to further cut bcvfd funding are even possible, when Brock has already cut them out of the insurance premium tax entirely and declared that the fiscal court would not be giving them another penny, I welcome that response. Finally, Brock's so called pledge to pay all legal expenses came with an important caveat that he mentioned at the bcvfd board meeting didn't it? That caveat was in exchange for the bcvfd giving all assets over to Brock he would pay legal fees (which I'm still not sure what ole Silver Tongue meant by that since legal fees are different from equipment costs like the $90,000 he denied the bcvfd in July for hoses and masks or the $13,000 he denied them in October for insurance). It's not like the bcvfd can trust the guy who has said on 3 news outlets the fiscal court never denied a legitimate expense to the bcvfd, even though a simple review of this paper's past articles and the fiscal court meetings each month show those denials i just mentioned did happen. So if you want to pick a side as a reporter, fine. Just do so while or after accurately reporting what happened and doing a little research instead of just repeating Albey's political talking points. Brock is the guy who falsely and maliciously smeared the bcvfd's reputation in 2007 and was smacked down in court for it and other bad acts he did. Never forget he is a politician with a personal ax to grind against the bcvfd because they stood up to him in 2007 and won. And please, everyone, go take a look at the 2007 documents and then reach your conclusion as to who's misleading you.
Sawbriar
|
January 12, 2012
What neither tne JE nor the newspaper explained is the difference between a government body such as fiscal court and a nonprofit charitable corporation. While they might seem similar on the surface, there are distinct differences. Apparently, the public will need to educate itself on this subject.

But I can help out a little. Being a 501(3)c corporation means you can't just send in a form to the state declaring yourself president of said corporation and have it be the truth. Isn't that right, judge?
RevMoore
|
January 12, 2012
What a bunch of maroons.
Weather
Sponsored By:

Lottery
Sponsored By:

Stocks
Sponsored By:

Gas Prices
Sponsored By:

Featured Businesses
Recipes
Sponsored By: